<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Didactic Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davefancher.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davefancher.com</link>
	<description>Learn By Doing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:56:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JustDecompile &#8211; One More Time by Vladimir Dragoev</title>
		<link>http://davefancher.com/2012/02/22/justdecompile-one-more-time/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladimir Dragoev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefancher.com/?p=1777#comment-590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Dave!

Thanks for the thorough feedback and your responsiveness. Your time and effort is much appreciated. It&#039;s been JustDecompile&#039;s philosophy to stay as close to the MSIL in the input assemblies as possible. When you compile something in Debug the MSIL produced by the compiler is similar to the C# produced by JustDecompile. If you compile these assemblies in Release then the MSIL will closely resemble original code. In that case JustDecompile will produce much better result.

But of course there are cases where we can do better no matter what kind the input assemblies are, and you have found such cases. So thanks once again and we&#039;ll take into serious account your feedback. I&#039;ll be more than happy if you give us another try after some time as we are confident on continuing to improve the decompilation besides adding new handy features.

Vladi,
The Telerik team]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave!</p>
<p>Thanks for the thorough feedback and your responsiveness. Your time and effort is much appreciated. It&#8217;s been JustDecompile&#8217;s philosophy to stay as close to the MSIL in the input assemblies as possible. When you compile something in Debug the MSIL produced by the compiler is similar to the C# produced by JustDecompile. If you compile these assemblies in Release then the MSIL will closely resemble original code. In that case JustDecompile will produce much better result.</p>
<p>But of course there are cases where we can do better no matter what kind the input assemblies are, and you have found such cases. So thanks once again and we&#8217;ll take into serious account your feedback. I&#8217;ll be more than happy if you give us another try after some time as we are confident on continuing to improve the decompilation besides adding new handy features.</p>
<p>Vladi,<br />
The Telerik team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JustDecompile &#8211; First Impressions by JustDecompile &#8211; One More Time &#124; Didactic Code</title>
		<link>http://davefancher.com/2011/05/25/justdecompile-first-impressions/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustDecompile &#8211; One More Time &#124; Didactic Code]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefancher.com/?p=930#comment-588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I first looked at JustDecompile last May (v2011.1.516.2) I had really high hopes for it but back then its output was far from acceptable. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I first looked at JustDecompile last May (v2011.1.516.2) I had really high hopes for it but back then its output was far from acceptable. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JustDecompile Revisited by JustDecompile &#8211; One More Time &#124; Didactic Code</title>
		<link>http://davefancher.com/2011/09/06/justdecompile-revisited/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JustDecompile &#8211; One More Time &#124; Didactic Code]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefancher.com/?p=1134#comment-587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] stages.  When I saw that it was officially released yesterday (14 Feb 2012) I remembered telling Vladimir Dragoev from the JustDecompile team that I&#8217;d give it another look.  I&#8217;ve been very critical of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stages.  When I saw that it was officially released yesterday (14 Feb 2012) I remembered telling Vladimir Dragoev from the JustDecompile team that I&#8217;d give it another look.  I&#8217;ve been very critical of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VSTS 2010 Load Test Browser Definitions by Dave Fancher</title>
		<link>http://davefancher.com/2011/05/18/vsts-2010-load-test-browser-definitions/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Fancher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefancher.com/?p=869#comment-585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad you found what you were looking for.  If you create any definitions beyond what I&#039;ve listed feel free to send them over and I&#039;ll include them in the list.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you found what you were looking for.  If you create any definitions beyond what I&#8217;ve listed feel free to send them over and I&#8217;ll include them in the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VSTS 2010 Load Test Browser Definitions by sambasiva</title>
		<link>http://davefancher.com/2011/05/18/vsts-2010-load-test-browser-definitions/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sambasiva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefancher.com/?p=869#comment-584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you very much,
 I&#039;m searching for adding browsers ,This is use full for me
 and you are right the resources on vsts LoadTest are very few indeed .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much,<br />
 I&#8217;m searching for adding browsers ,This is use full for me<br />
 and you are right the resources on vsts LoadTest are very few indeed .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JustDecompile Revisited by Dave Fancher</title>
		<link>http://davefancher.com/2011/09/06/justdecompile-revisited/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Fancher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefancher.com/?p=1134#comment-581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a note about its release on twitter and have already downloaded it.  I haven&#039;t gotten very far with it but I already have a new post in progress.  I&#039;ll let you know when it&#039;s up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a note about its release on twitter and have already downloaded it.  I haven&#8217;t gotten very far with it but I already have a new post in progress.  I&#8217;ll let you know when it&#8217;s up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [AgileIndy] Effective Retrospectives by The Starfish Retrospective &#124; (Agile) Testing</title>
		<link>http://davefancher.com/2011/11/10/agileindy-effective-retrospectives/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Starfish Retrospective &#124; (Agile) Testing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefancher.com/?p=1416#comment-580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] [AgileIndy] Effective Retrospectives [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [AgileIndy] Effective Retrospectives [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JustDecompile Revisited by Vladimir Dragoev</title>
		<link>http://davefancher.com/2011/09/06/justdecompile-revisited/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladimir Dragoev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefancher.com/?p=1134#comment-579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Dave,

I&#039;d like to ask you to try the latest JustDecompile release, which is our official version (no more Beta :)) with fully rebuilt decompilation engine, and let us know what you think. We&#039;ll greatly appreciate if you are willing to make new review of the tool.

Kind regards,
Vladi
The Telerik team]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to ask you to try the latest JustDecompile release, which is our official version (no more Beta :)) with fully rebuilt decompilation engine, and let us know what you think. We&#8217;ll greatly appreciate if you are willing to make new review of the tool.</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Vladi<br />
The Telerik team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Archiving with Mercurial by Archiving with Mercurial &#124; Life goes on</title>
		<link>http://davefancher.com/2011/11/21/archiving-with-mercurial/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Archiving with Mercurial &#124; Life goes on]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefancher.com/?p=1442#comment-559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Archiving with Mercurial &#124; Didactic Code. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Archiving with Mercurial | Didactic Code. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VSTS 2010 Load Test Browser Definitions by Durd</title>
		<link>http://davefancher.com/2011/05/18/vsts-2010-load-test-browser-definitions/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Durd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davefancher.com/?p=869#comment-557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Muchas gracias]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muchas gracias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

